
Lesson Plan -- Student
Indian Removal in the 1830s
A
Document-Based
Question
by Brandy Mohr
Historical Context: Citizens of the United States have been
interacting
with Native Americans from the colonial period up through the era of
Jackson. As the United States expanded beyond the original thirteen
colonies, Americans increased their contact with Native Americans. In
order to regulate interactions and maintain uniformity, legal and official
dealings with Native Americans were restricted to Federal treaties. From
1816-1840 tribes located between the Mississippi River and the original
thirteen colonies were encouraged and impelled to move west, more than
forty (40) treaties were signed in this time period. When Andrew Jackson
became president, he made Indian removal a priority and passed the Indian
Removal Act (1830).
Directions: The following question is based on the
accompanying
documents. The question is designed to test your ability to analyze and
interpret historical documents. Some of the documents have been edited or
abbreviated so that they are more manageable; please answer the questions
based on the section of the document that you have in front of you. As
you look at these documents, take into consideration the authors' points
of
view and any outside knowledge you have of the situation.
1. Carefully read the essay question. What do you already know about
this topic? How would answer this question without any documents? You
may want to jot down a few notes or ideas on your paper.
2. Now look at the documents that you are provided with and read them
over carefully. You may want to underline key ideas or make notes in the
margins.
3. Answer the questions that accompany the documents. Remember that
these questions are based solely on the document and not on outside
knowledge you may have.
4. Once you have analyzed the documents go back and look over the
document-based question again. How might these documents fit into your
existing ideas about this topic?
5. Based on your knowledge of the topic and the documents provided,
formulate a thesis or argument that directly addresses the question.
6. Organize your thoughts or ideas into an outline or chart that will
help you as you are writing your essay.
7. Write a well-organized essay that provides support for your
argument. Your essay should draw on at least five (5) of the documents.
You should also include outside knowledge that you have about the topic.
Task: Using the documents provided, discuss the crisis
that
developed
around the issue of Indian removal in the 1830s, making sure to evaluate
the pros and cons surrounding Indian removal as well as the various
positions
that were taken by Americans and Native Americans.
Part A:Short-Answer Questions The following
documents deal with Indian removal in the
Jacksonian era. These documents will help provide you with clues about
how and why Indian removal developed as it did. Carefully read and
examine each of the documents and then answer the question or questions
that follow.
Document 1
Map of Georgia, 1830

1. Using the map above, explain why many residents of Georgia were in
favor of moving the Cherokee Indians west of the Mississippi.
Document 2
"From the commencement of our government Congress has passed acts to
regulate trade and intercourse with the Indians; which treat them as
nations, respect their rights, and manifest a firm purpose to afford that
protection which treaties stipulate. All these acts, and especially that
of 1802, which is still in force, manifestly consider the several Indian
nations as distinct political communities, having territorial boundaries,
within which their authority is exclusive, and having a right to all the
lands within those boundaries, which is not only acknowledged, but
guaranteed by the United States. . . . The Cherokee Nation, then, is a
distinct community, occupying its own territory, with boundaries
accurately described, in which the laws of Georgia can have no force, and
which the citizens of Georgia have no right"
John Marshall,
Worcester v. Georgia, 1832.
2. What does
Marshall say about the laws of Georgia?
3. How does Marshall defend his opinions?
Document 3
Indian Removal Act of 1830
Chap. CXLVIII.--An Act to provide for an exchange of lands
with the
Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their
removal west of the river Mississippi. Be it enacted by the Senate and
House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress
assembled, That it shall and may be lawful for the President of the United
States to cause so much of any territory belonging to the United States,
west of the river Mississippi, not included in any state or organized
territory, and to which the Indian title has been extinguished, as he may
judge necessary, to be divided into a suitable number of districts, for
the reception of such tribes or nations of Indians as may choose to
exchange the lands where they now reside, and remove there; and to cause
each of said districts to be so described by natural or artificial marks,
as to be easily distinguished from every other.
4. In your own words, what does this law do?
Document 4
Memorial Of John Ross and Others before Congress

5. Using the main paragraph, explain why the Cherokee felt that they were
being exploited.
6. Is there support for this argument? If so, how much and what
kind?
Document 5
"All these States and territories were desirous, and most justly and
naturally so, to get possession of these vast bodies of land, generally
the best within their limits. Justice to the other States and territories
required the relief; and the applications to the federal government, to
which the right of purchasing Indian lands, even within the States,
exclusively belonged, were incessant and urgent."
~ Thomas Hart Benton
7. Why did Benton believe that Indian removal was a priority?
Document 6
"It will separate the Indians from immediate contact
with settlements of whites; free them from the power of the States; enable
them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude
institutions; will retard the progress of decay, which is lessening their
numbers, and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the
Government and through the influence of good counsels to cast off their
savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian
community. These consequences, some of them so certain and the rest so
probable, make the complete execution of the plan sanctioned by Congress
at their last session an object of much solicitude."
~ Andrew
Jackson.
2nd Annual Address to Congress.
December 8,
1830
8. Why did Jackson believe that Indian removal was an important
policy?
Document 7"In May 1838, I witnessed the execution
of
the most brutal order in the History of American Warfare. I saw helpless
Cherokees arrested and dragged from their homes...I saw them loaded like
cattle or sheep into six hundred forty-five wagons and started toward the
west...When the bugle sounded and the wagons started rolling many of the
children rose to their feet and waved their little hands good-bye to their
mountain homes, knowing they were leaving them forever. Many of these
helpless people did not have blankets and many of them had been driven
from home barefooted...."
- John Burnett, a soldier serving as an interpreter
9. What does Burnett tell us about the treatment of Native
Americans?
10. Was this move voluntary?
Part B: Using your own knowledge about Indian removal and the
1830s,
combined with the documents that you have read, complete the following
task: discuss the crisis that developed around the issue of Indian removal
in the 1830s in a well-written essay. Make sure that you evaluate the
pros and cons surrounding Indian removal, as well as the various positions
that were taken by Americans and Native Americans.
Grading Rubric
The following is a list of answers that are considered good or acceptable
for the short answer questions. Complete sentences are not necessary to
receive credit; rather, the answer should contain evidence that the
student
understands the question and can use the document to provide an answer.
Document 1: A good answer to this question would discuss the
amount of
land that was owned by the Cherokees. The following is a good example:
Georgia residents may have wanted the Indians to move west because they
owned so
much land in Georgia.
Document 2: Marshall said that the laws of Georgia do not apply to
Cherokee territory or that Georgia has no legal right to make laws that
extend to the Cherokees. Students may directly quote from the passage.
As evidence Marshall uses the existence of legal treaties and
legislation. A student may also state that only Congress can make treaties
with the Indians or that the Cherokee Nation constitutes its own
land/territory that is not a part of the U.S. and is not subject to the
rules of individual states.
Document 3: Students should not quote directly from the passage
because
they have been asked to paraphrase their response. A good example may be
that the Act sets aside land west of the Mississippi for Indians who agree
to leave their homes in the east. A student may also say that this law
attempts to move Indians west of the Mississippi River.
Document 4: The Cherokee feel that their rights are being violated
because they have old treaties that guarantee the land that they are now
being forced off. Another example might be that their old treaties are
being ignored or disregarded.
There is support for this argument evidenced by the petition with
thousands of signatures. Students may also note that there is support that
is coming from other Indians.
Document 5: Benton believes that Indian removal was a priority
because of
the desire for land.
Document 6: Jackson believed that the policy of Indian removal was
important because it would benefit whites and Indians alike. Removal
separates Americans and Indians and allows the Indians to pursue their own
way of life. A good answer will state that Indian removal is beneficial to
the race/culture of Americans and Indians and may use quotes from the
excerpt as support.
Document 7: Burnett tells us that the Indians were treated
harshly,
like
animals. Students may also state that the Indians were not given adequate
clothing or allowed to prepare for their trip.
Students should state that this is not a voluntary trip if people
are being dragged from their homes and forced to march.
Essay:
A good essay will be well thought out and organized. It should
show that the student was able to think about the topic in a coherent
manner and not just reiterate what they learned from the documents.
Students should use at least four of the seven documents; better essays
will be able to incorporate more of the documents. It is also important
that the student uses outside information in the essay.
In discussing the crisis, students should indicate that
there was
a
controversy and debate surrounding the idea of Indian removal. As such,
students must demonstrate that there were people in favor of removal and
those who were opposed to removal. Students should be able to use the
documents and outside information to explain why people in the 1830s were
either against or in favor of removal. Their discussion should not only
consider the different positions of individuals and groups, but their
potential biases as well. It is important that students discuss both the
pro and con aspects of removal, so that they demonstrate a more complete
understanding of the conflict that occurred in the 1830s. Students can
argue that one side of the debate held more merit than the other or that
one side was ultimately correct as long as they demonstrate that they
understand both sides of the argument.
Outside Information that students might incorporate:
- Trail of Tears.
- Details of Worcester v. Georgia.
- Evidence of Cherokee civilization, such as their government,
alphabet, or
lifestyle.
- Information about the removal of other Indian groups, such as the
Creeks or
Seminoles.
- The drive for westward expansion and new growth.
Rationale for Document Choices
Document 1: Map of Georgia, 1830
http://www.cviog.uga.edu/Projects/gainfo/histcountymaps/cherokeenation1830map.htm
The very first document that I chose was the map of Georgia
in the
1830s. I thought that it was important for two reasons: first, it
demonstrates how close Indians were to the citizens, and that Indians were
indeed an important presence; second, the map illustrates just how much
territory the Cherokees had, making land claims more understandable. I
feel that students today do not appreciate the role the Indians played in
early America; rather they see Indians as a western phenomenon that looks
good in movies. It is also important that they see how much land is being
discussed: Georgia residents wanted more than a few more feet to add on to
the state.
Document 2: Worcester v. Georgia, 1832
http://www.civics-online.org/library/formatted/texts/worcester.html
The second
document that I selected was an excerpt from John
Marshall, which I thought clearly captured the controversy in Georgia.
The State did not have the right to make laws that extended to the
territory of the Indians. I hoped that students would be able to grasp
this idea and use it to explain a piece of the controversy. Marshall also
discusses briefly the existence of other treaties, which could help prompt
students to bring in outside information about such treaties.
Document 3: Indian Removal Act of 1830
http://www.civics-online.org/library/formatted/texts/indian_act.html
The Indian Removal Act was the third document in the list.
Because this is a DBQ about Indian removal, I thought that it was
important to include this key piece of legislation. I chose just one
segment so that students could get a feel for the law and the way that it
was set up as "an exchange."
Document 4: Memorial of John Ross and Others before Congress, 1834
http://www.1st-hand-history.org/Congress/cd71/03.jpg
The next document that I incorporated was a section of speech
given before Congress. This particular speech is useful because it goes
back to the existence of earlier treaties and also shows, via the petition
mentioned, that there was an immense amount of Indian opposition to
removal. I also thought that this was a good document to use because the
more savvy students will be able to use it as evidence that the Cherokee
Nation is not uncivilized; rather they are signing petitions and
testifying before Congress.
Document 5: Thomas Hart Benton on Indian Removal
http://history.smsu.edu/FTMiller/LocalHistory/Docs/Benton/30Years/BentonIndianRemoval.htm
Document
6: Andrew Jackson, Address to Congress, 1830
http://mail.rcds.rye.ny.us/~history/Sampson/Jackson%20debate/jackson_indian_removal.htm
The piece from
Benton goes back to the question of land and
gives
students definitive evidence that one of the reasons for Indian removal
was so that the people of Georgia could take their land. In order to
compliment the piece by Benton, I added this clip from Jackson's second
address to Congress in which he talks about Indian removal as a
humanitarian process. I would hope that from class discussions students
would know that Jackson was merely paying lip service to this issue;
however, if students are not aware of this, they can still use it as one
of the reasons that some people wanted Indians removed.
Document 7: John Burnett on the Trail of Tears
http://happytrails_2.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/white_man%5B1%5D.htm
My final document
is from a soldier who accompanied the
Cherokee
on the forced march west. I thought that it was a critical piece to the
puzzle of Indian removal, so that students realize that there was not a
peaceful resolution to this debate. This document lends itself to
students wishing to bring in information on the Trail of Tears and other
Indian removal debacles such as the Seminole Wars in Florida.
In choosing these documents, I wanted students to get a feel
for
some of the debate that circulated around the issue of Indian removal.
Too often we simply hear about the Trail of Tears and American atrocities
without actually looking at the specifics of the situation. This DBQ is
designed to challenge students and ask them to use the documents and
provide specific information about the crisis. The students main argument
may well be that Indian removal was a big mistake; it may also be,
however, that as America expanded beyond the original colonies and grew
into a larger nation, Native Americans were forced to move west. This DBQ
is designed to allow students to think for themselves and use the
documents to draw their own conclusions.